From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 20:59:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED7AA0F.6090308@wanadoo.es> (raw)
Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>>You finally fixed a SEGV that I fixed well
>>over a year ago. Congradulations. You have
>>others to fix, and a minor (?) security
>>issue as well. Have fun.
>
> Again, you know there is a problem but you
> don't say anything about it.
> You do not want to fix it, don't you ?
> This is fine with me (even if it is hard to
> understand the reason), but you are just
> /wrong/ when you know about a problem and
> don't provide information about it.
> Again, this is just my opinion...
the root of the problem is that not all
packages maintainers of distributions send feedback/fixes
to _origianl software writer_. And you have cases
like this. Diferents tastes from same software,
everyone with its bugs and features.
Without to go too far, there are a lot of stupid
fixes into distributions kernels not present in 2.4.21-rcX
This is a general problem, and IMHO the distributions maintainers
should send more feedback to package maintainer more frequently.
-thanks-
regards,
--
Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free.
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-30 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 18:59 Xose Vazquez Perez [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-31 2:36 [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30 8:12 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2003-05-30 8:20 ` cosmos
[not found] <1054270854.22088.617.camel@cube>
2003-05-30 6:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-01 4:53 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-05-30 16:56 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
[not found] ` <3ED788B5.2080203@wanadoo.es>
2003-05-31 1:25 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-05-30 5:30 Albert Cahalan
2003-05-29 17:25 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-29 18:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-05-29 11:16 ` Robert Love
2003-05-29 20:01 ` Vincent Hanquez
2003-05-29 15:40 ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 15:09 Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:19 ` Phil Oester
2003-05-28 16:22 ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:59 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ED7AA0F.6090308@wanadoo.es \
--to=xose@wanadoo.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox