htree for 2.4 ext[23]

htree for 2.4 ext[23]

[Paul P Komkoff Jr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Anybody have working backport of these ?

Stuff available at http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/ IS a)
outdated b) gives unpredictable results (e.g. eating filesystems)

- -- 
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
 This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE+2eDGyMW8naS07KQRAqP7AJ90Sf6bmelf4S9nM3AAuEkOOKpf9gCeKT3F
VD5Sp9D9g2hk+MdW57fthEQ=
=8jj2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: htree for 2.4 ext[23]

[Andreas Dilger]

On Jun 01, 2003  15:17 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> Anybody have working backport of these ?
> 
> Stuff available at http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/ IS a)
> outdated b) gives unpredictable results (e.g. eating filesystems)

Yes, we have a working set of patches for 2.4.20 and a few other kernels
in our CVS repository.  However, these are just taken from Ted's ext3 BK
repository (I don't think we changed them at all).

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-1.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-2.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-3.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-4.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel


Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

Re: htree for 2.4 ext[23]

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

Andreas Dilger wrote:

> On Jun 01, 2003  15:17 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
>> Anybody have working backport of these ?
>> 
>> Stuff available at http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/ IS a)
>> outdated b) gives unpredictable results (e.g. eating filesystems)
> 
> Yes, we have a working set of patches for 2.4.20 and a few other kernels
> in our CVS repository.  However, these are just taken from Ted's ext3 BK
> repository (I don't think we changed them at all).
> 
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-1.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-2.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-3.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lustre/lustre/kernel_patches/patches/Attic/ext-2.4-patch-4.patch?rev=1.1.6.1&only_with_tag=b_devel

what is about mingo patches?
http://people.redhat.com/sct/patches/ext3-2.4/dev-20030314/
are same than tytso?

regards,
-- 
Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free.