From: Mark Peloquin <peloquin@austin.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Nightly regression run results
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:26:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EDF6F49.8070201@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
Here are links to some 2.5.70 nightly regression comparisons:
Each -bk snapshot compared to the base:
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk1/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk1/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk2/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk2/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk3/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk3/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk4/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk4/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk5/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk5/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk6/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk6/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk7/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk7/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk8/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk8/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk9/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk9/
Each -bk snapshot compared to the previous:
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk1/2.5.70-bk1-vs-2.5.70-bk2/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk2/2.5.70-bk2-vs-2.5.70-bk3/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk3/2.5.70-bk3-vs-2.5.70-bk4/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk4/2.5.70-bk4-vs-2.5.70-bk5/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk5/2.5.70-bk5-vs-2.5.70-bk6/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk6/2.5.70-bk6-vs-2.5.70-bk7/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk7/2.5.70-bk7-vs-2.5.70-bk8/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk8/2.5.70-bk8-vs-2.5.70-bk9/
Each -mm patch compared to the base:
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm1/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm1/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm2/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm2/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm3/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm3/
Each -mm patch compared to the previous:
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm2/2.5.70-mm1-vs-2.5.70-mm2/
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm3/2.5.70-mm2-vs-2.5.70-mm3/
Each -mjb patch compared to the base:
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mjb1/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mjb1/
Mark
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-05 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 16:26 Mark Peloquin [this message]
2003-06-06 1:34 ` Nightly regression run results Nick Piggin
2003-06-06 22:38 ` Mark Peloquin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-05 18:45 Steven Pratt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EDF6F49.8070201@austin.ibm.com \
--to=peloquin@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox