From: Mark Peloquin <peloquin@austin.ibm.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm4, mm5, bk10 regression results
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:01:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE12B5C.8040709@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 28380000.1054939465@flay
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>>latest -mm tree results:
>>
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm4/2.5.70-mm3-vs-2.5.70-mm4/
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm4/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm4/
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm5/2.5.70-mm4-vs-2.5.70-mm5/
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-mm5/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-mm5/
>>
>>latest -bk tree results:
>>
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk10/2.5.70-bk9-vs-2.5.70-bk10/
>>http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linuxperf/regression/2.5.70-bk10/2.5.70-vs-2.5.70-bk10/
>>
>>
>
>
>Great stuff ;-)
>
>The summaries you have on the web pages are really useful, and look short
>enough to go into the email. Any chance you could include them in future
>emails?
>
Yes they can, however, they will be a few issues. Currently the nightly
and the benchmark summaries are html and posting html is not allowed.
Converting them to text with URLs unhides the nice way hyperlinks buries
a long URL and shows a short hyperlink name, thus producing long lines
that wrap and distort the formatting. Are the summaries still
worthwhile without the URLs to the data? For the toplevel summary,
probably not, and I'm fairly sure this was what you were requesting.
Let me think about how the summaries could be changed to accomodate your
request. One less link to traverse would be bring the data closer to the
viewer's eyes and thats a good thing. :)
Thanks for the feedback,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 22:44 mm4, mm5, bk10 regression results Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-07 0:01 ` Mark Peloquin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-06 21:53 Mark Peloquin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EE12B5C.8040709@austin.ibm.com \
--to=peloquin@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox