public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Francisco Ribeiro Neto" <xyko@ipiranga.com.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Wrong number of cpus detected/reported
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:50:38 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE6287E.4050707@ipiranga.com.br> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

Hi,

first of all please apologize me because I didn't subscribe the list. I 
really even don't know if this list is the appropriate place to have my 
question discussed but I didn't found any better one.

I installed a RedHat 7.1 system on a 4 way 1.4 Gz Compaq DL580 server 
with kernel 2.4.2 and everything goes right. Because of some other 
prerequisite needs I had to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.9-34.

After the upgrade the system is reporting that the machine has 8 cpu 
instead of 4. I have been looking for some kind of information on the 
Internet (www.google.com/linux) about that but I didn't have success.

Does anybody can tell me if I will face some major problem and why the 
system is detecting (or only reporting) the wrong number of cpus ? There 
is anything that I can do to have my system detecting the right number 
of cpus ?

Attached there are a tar.gz file containing :

nohup.out => standard output from make bzImage
modules.out => standard output from make modules
modules.err => standard error from make modules
cpuinfo => /proc/cpuinfo

The kernel was compiled using the kernel.....-enterprise config from 
/usr/src/linux-2.4/configs (smp=yes, highmem=64M)

Thanks in advance.

[-- Attachment #2: files.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 41242 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2003-06-10 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-10 18:50 José Francisco Ribeiro Neto [this message]
2003-06-10 20:17 ` Wrong number of cpus detected/reported David Schwartz
2003-06-10 21:08   ` Timothy Miller
     [not found] <434747C01D5AC443809D5FC5405011310B7169@bobcat.unickz.com>
2003-06-10 20:21 ` John Appleby
2003-06-10 20:36   ` Samuel Flory
2003-06-10 21:04     ` Steven Cole
2003-06-10 21:35       ` Alan Cox
2003-06-10 21:52         ` Steven Cole
2003-06-10 22:06           ` Alan Cox
2003-06-10 22:16           ` mikpe
2003-06-11 16:17             ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-11 16:28               ` mikpe
2003-06-11 21:26               ` Con Kolivas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-10 20:35 Lauro, John
     [not found] <434747C01D5AC443809D5FC5405011310B7190@bobcat.unickz.com>
2003-06-10 21:11 ` John Appleby
2003-06-11  0:04 Lauro, John

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EE6287E.4050707@ipiranga.com.br \
    --to=xyko@ipiranga.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xyko_ig@ig.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox