2.5.71 compile error on alpha

2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

hi,

i have an alpha here, running 2.5.70 for weeks now. the patch to 2.5.71
applied with no errors (i did "make clean" before this) but it won't
compile:

# make vmlinux modules modules_install

...

   CC      arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.o
arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c:269: warning: `srmcons_ops' defined but not used
make[2]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2
------------

compiler is gcc3.3, .config did not change (new options in 2.5.71 with
"No" answered).

Thanks,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Måns Rullgård]

Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> writes:

> i have an alpha here, running 2.5.70 for weeks now. the patch to 2.5.71
> applied with no errors (i did "make clean" before this) but it won't
> compile:
> 
> # make vmlinux modules modules_install
> 
> ...
> 
>    CC      arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.o
> arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c:269: warning: `srmcons_ops' defined but not used
> make[2]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2

Not looking at the code, I guess you could just remove the definition
of srmcons_ops from srmcons.c.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Ivan Kokshaysky]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:00:01AM +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Not looking at the code, I guess you could just remove the definition
> of srmcons_ops from srmcons.c.

No, use appended patch.

Ivan.

--- 2.5.72/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c	Mon Jun 16 16:00:39 2003
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c	Mon Jun 16 16:13:17 2003
@@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ srmcons_init(void)
 		driver->type = TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_SYSTEM;
 		driver->subtype = SYSTEM_TYPE_SYSCONS;
 		driver->init_termios = tty_std_termios;
+		tty_set_operations(driver, &srmcons_ops);
 		err = tty_register_driver(driver);
 		if (err) {
 			put_tty_driver(driver);

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

oh, 2.5.72 is out but since it does not touch srmcons.c i applied the 
patch to 2.5.72 too and see how it goes.

Thanks,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

Marc Zyngier schrieb:
> Please try this patch :
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105540998415031&w=2
> 

ok, that did it, but then another error showed up:

[...]
   AS      arch/alpha/lib/stxcpy.o
   AS      arch/alpha/lib/stxncpy.o
   CC      arch/alpha/lib/udelay.o
   AR      arch/alpha/lib/lib.a
   CPP     arch/alpha/vmlinux.lds.s
   GEN     .version
   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
   UPD     include/linux/compile.h
   CC      init/version.o
   LD      init/built-in.o
   LD      vmlinux
net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x484): In function `flow_cache_init':
: undefined reference to `register_cpu_notifier'
net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x488): In function `flow_cache_init':
: undefined reference to `register_cpu_notifier'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
lila:/usr/src/linux-2.5#

oh, just before vmlinux was made! before & after applying the patch i 
did "make clean" (do i have to make clean "before" applying patches 
anyway? after applying patches and before making targets, yes.)

oh, and this alpha is named "Avanti" but a kernel compile needs 80mins 
or so :-)

Thank you,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Måns Rullgård]

Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> writes:

> oh, just before vmlinux was made! before & after applying the patch i
> did "make clean" (do i have to make clean "before" applying patches
> anyway? after applying patches and before making targets, yes.)

I don't think so.

> oh, and this alpha is named "Avanti" but a kernel compile needs 80mins
> or so :-)

That's typical for the slower Avantis.  Is your's something like 100 MHz?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 774 bytes --]

On Tue, 2003-06-17 20:26:35 +0200, Måns Rullgård <mru@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote in message <yw1xk7bk36hw.fsf@zaphod.guide>:
> Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> writes:
> 
> > oh, and this alpha is named "Avanti" but a kernel compile needs 80mins
> > or so :-)
> 
> That's typical for the slower Avantis.  Is your's something like 100 MHz?

Well, that's mainly a question of compiler version and the quantity of
modules you attempt to build...

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
      ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

Jan-Benedict Glaw schrieb:
>>That's typical for the slower Avantis.  Is your's something like 100 MHz?
> 
> Well, that's mainly a question of compiler version and the quantity of
> modules you attempt to build...

it's both :-)

lila:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu			: Alpha
cpu model		: EV45
cpu variation		: 7
cpu revision		: 0
cpu serial number	:
system type		: Avanti
system variation	: 0
system revision		: 0
system serial number	:
cycle frequency [Hz]	: 232018561
timer frequency [Hz]	: 1024.00
page size [bytes]	: 8192
phys. address bits	: 34
max. addr. space #	: 63
BogoMIPS		: 458.36
kernel unaligned acc	: 32 (pc=fffffc0000478394,va=fffffc0002dbf176)
user unaligned acc	: 0 (pc=0,va=0)
platform string		: AlphaStation 255/233
cpus detected		: 1

lila:~# find /lib/modules/2.5.70/ | wc -l
      62
lila:~#


(still compiling (gcc3.3) 2.5.72....)

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Måns Rullgård]

Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> writes:

> >>That's typical for the slower Avantis.  Is your's something like 100 MHz?
> > Well, that's mainly a question of compiler version and the quantity
> > of
> > modules you attempt to build...
> 
> it's both :-)
> 
> lila:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> cpu			: Alpha
> cpu model		: EV45
> cpu variation		: 7
> cpu revision		: 0
> cpu serial number	:
> system type		: Avanti
> system variation	: 0
> system revision		: 0
> system serial number	:
> cycle frequency [Hz]	: 232018561
> timer frequency [Hz]	: 1024.00
> page size [bytes]	: 8192
> phys. address bits	: 34
> max. addr. space #	: 63
> BogoMIPS		: 458.36
> kernel unaligned acc	: 32 (pc=fffffc0000478394,va=fffffc0002dbf176)

That's not good.  Do you know what is causing it.

> user unaligned acc	: 0 (pc=0,va=0)
> platform string		: AlphaStation 255/233

I use one of those for a firewall/router.

> cpus detected		: 1


-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

Måns Rullgård schrieb:
>>lila:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
[...]
>>kernel unaligned acc	: 32 (pc=fffffc0000478394,va=fffffc0002dbf176)
> 
> That's not good.  Do you know what is causing it.

i did not even know that this one is bad. the only weird thing which 
comes into my mind when thinking about this alpha is: it is filled up 
whith fine 128 MB RAM -- but it is only seeing 64 MB. when we inserted 
64 MB RAM, only 32 MB are recognized. with 32 MB working with it was no 
fun, working with 64 MB is quite good. must be the type of RAM but i 
don't really know much about the different RAM types.

> Good, what's it like performance-wise?  2.5.68 had trouble with my IDE
> disks, and I wonder if it's been fixed since.

can't tell about IDE, since it has only scsi in it. i used to run 
benchmarks (tiobench) on the alpha, with different loop-mounted 
filesystems, but the alpha has been frozen very often during these 
benchmarks...will redo with 2.5.72 later.

Thanks,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Christian Kujau wrote:
> i did not even know that this one is bad. the only weird thing which 
> comes into my mind when thinking about this alpha is: it is filled up 
> whith fine 128 MB RAM -- but it is only seeing 64 MB. when we inserted 
> 64 MB RAM, only 32 MB are recognized. with 32 MB working with it was no 
> fun, working with 64 MB is quite good. must be the type of RAM but i 
> don't really know much about the different RAM types.

Is this SDRAM? May be 4-bank SDRAM, while your memory controller supports
2-bank SDRAM only.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

yes, after 130 minutes: 2.5.72 _with_ applied srmcons-patch compiled and 
has booted fine.

Thanks,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Christian Kujau]

yes, after 130 minutes: 2.5.72 _with_ applied srmcons-patch compiled and 
has booted fine.

Thanks,
Christian.

Re: 2.5.71 compile error on alpha

[Måns Rullgård]

Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de> writes:

> yes, after 130 minutes: 2.5.72 _with_ applied srmcons-patch compiled
> and has booted fine.

Good, what's it like performance-wise?  2.5.68 had trouble with my IDE
disks, and I wonder if it's been fixed since.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net