* [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 comparison
@ 2003-06-19 2:18 Mark Peloquin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mark Peloquin @ 2003-06-19 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linstab, ltp-results
Thought some of you might get a kick out of seeing this. :)
Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.4.20 vs 2.5.71
Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions Results Results Summary
--------------- --------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -------
dbench.ext2 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.ext3 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.jfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.reiser P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.xfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
kernbench P N N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
lmbench P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
rawiobench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
specjbb P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
specsdet P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tbench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.ext2 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.ext3 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.jfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.reiser P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.xfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
volanomark P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71/2.4.20-vs-2.5.71/
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-06-19 2:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-19 2:18 [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 comparison Mark Peloquin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox