From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265699AbTFSCG4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:06:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265701AbTFSCG4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:06:56 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:64177 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265699AbTFSCGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3EF11D5C.3030808@austin.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:18:04 -0500 From: Mark Peloquin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel , linstab , ltp-results Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 comparison Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thought some of you might get a kick out of seeing this. :) Nightly Regression Summary for 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions Results Results Summary --------------- --------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ------- dbench.ext2 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.ext3 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.jfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.reiser P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report dbench.xfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report kernbench P N N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report lmbench P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report rawiobench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report specjbb P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report specsdet P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tbench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.ext2 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.ext3 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.jfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.reiser P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report tiobench.xfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report volanomark P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71/2.4.20-vs-2.5.71/ Mark