public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Peter Wong <wpeter@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Mike Sullivan <mksully@us.ibm.com>,
	Bill Hartner <bhartner@us.ibm.com>,
	Ray Venditti <venditti@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Evaluation of three I/O schedulers
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:12:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F012663.5040704@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF9393D547.0D1D003C-ON85256D55.004DFAA4@pok.ibm.com>

Peter Wong wrote:

>We used 2.5.72+mm1 to evaluate three I/O schedulers, namely
>anticipatory, deadline and complete fair queueing under a very heavy
>database workload on an 8-way Pentium 4 machine. The workload is a
>decision support system doing mostly sequential I/O and each run takes
>about one hour. All three runs finished completely without encountering
>functional problems, and achieved similar performance level.
>
>The 8-way machine has Pentium 4 2.0 GHz processors, 16 GB physical
>memory, 2MB L3 cache, 8 FC controllers with 80 disks. Hyperthreading
>was turned on for the three runs. The CPU utilization is similar for all
>three runs: 65% user, 7% system and 28% idle.
>

Hi Peter,
How many block devices are being used at once in your tests?
I would be interested to see profiles of AS and DL if possible.
Thanks.

Nick


      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-01  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-30 14:21 Evaluation of three I/O schedulers Peter Wong
2003-06-30 15:15 ` Dave Hansen
2003-07-01  6:12 ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F012663.5040704@cyberone.com.au \
    --to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=bhartner@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mksully@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=venditti@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=wpeter@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox