public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCHES 2.5.74-mm2] misc. nbd cleanups/fixes
@ 2003-07-06 20:11 Paul Clements
  2003-07-06 20:33 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Clements @ 2003-07-06 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

Andrew,

here are two nbd patches to apply to 2.5.74-mm2 after two of the
previous patches (from Lou Langholtz) are reverted:

nbd-ioctl-compat.patch  (patch 6)
nbd-locking-fixes.patch (patch 7)

I'm fine with leaving the first 5 patches of his in there.


The two attached patches are:

1) nbd-remove_open_release.diff - remove the unneeded nbd_open and
nbd_release functions

2) nbd-block_layer_compat.diff - ensure that nbd and the block layer
agree about device block sizes and total device sizes

and should be applied in this order.

Thanks,
Paul

[-- Attachment #2: nbd-remove_open_release.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2073 bytes --]

--- linux-2.5.74-mm2/drivers/block/nbd.c.MINUS_LL	2003-07-06 11:31:51.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.5.74-mm2/drivers/block/nbd.c	2003-07-06 11:36:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -77,8 +77,6 @@
 #define dprintk(flags, fmt...) do { \
 	if (debugflags & (flags)) printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt); \
 } while (0)
-#define DBG_OPEN        0x0001
-#define DBG_RELEASE     0x0002
 #define DBG_IOCTL       0x0004
 #define DBG_INIT        0x0010
 #define DBG_EXIT        0x0020
@@ -521,33 +519,6 @@ static void do_nbd_request(request_queue
 	return;
 }
 
-static int nbd_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
-	struct nbd_device *lo = inode->i_bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
-
-	dprintk(DBG_OPEN, "%s: nbd_open refcnt=%d\n", lo->disk->disk_name,
-			lo->refcnt);
-	lo->refcnt++;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int nbd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
-	struct nbd_device *lo = inode->i_bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
-
-#ifdef PARANOIA
-	if (lo->refcnt <= 0) {
-		printk(KERN_ALERT "%s: nbd_release: refcount(%d) <= 0\n",
-				lo->disk->disk_name, lo->refcnt);
-		BUG();
-	}
-#endif
-	lo->refcnt--;
-	dprintk(DBG_RELEASE, "%s: nbd_release: refcnt=%d\n",
-			lo->disk->disk_name, lo->refcnt);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 		     unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -555,6 +526,8 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
 	int error;
 	struct request sreq ;
 
+	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
 #ifdef PARANOIA
 	BUG_ON(lo->magic != LO_MAGIC);
 #endif
@@ -562,8 +535,6 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
 	dprintk(DBG_IOCTL, "%s: nbd_ioctl cmd=%s(0x%x) arg=%lu\n",
 			lo->disk->disk_name, ioctl_cmd_to_ascii(cmd), cmd, arg);
 
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return -EPERM;
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case NBD_DISCONNECT:
 	        printk(KERN_INFO "%s: NBD_DISCONNECT\n", lo->disk->disk_name);
@@ -678,8 +649,6 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
 static struct block_device_operations nbd_fops =
 {
 	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
-	.open =		nbd_open,
-	.release =	nbd_release,
 	.ioctl =	nbd_ioctl,
 };
 

[-- Attachment #3: nbd-block_layer_compat.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1081 bytes --]

--- linux-2.5.74-mm2/drivers/block/nbd.c.MINUS_OPEN_RELEASE	2003-07-06 11:36:51.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.5.74-mm2/drivers/block/nbd.c	2003-07-06 11:43:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -591,15 +591,21 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
 		if ((arg & (arg-1)) || (arg < 512) || (arg > PAGE_SIZE))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		lo->blksize = arg;
-		lo->bytesize &= ~(lo->blksize-1); 
+		lo->bytesize &= ~(lo->blksize-1);
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_inode->i_size = lo->bytesize;
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_block_size = lo->blksize;
 		set_capacity(lo->disk, lo->bytesize >> 9);
 		return 0;
 	case NBD_SET_SIZE:
-		lo->bytesize = arg & ~(lo->blksize-1); 
+		lo->bytesize = arg & ~(lo->blksize-1);
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_inode->i_size = lo->bytesize;
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_block_size = lo->blksize;
 		set_capacity(lo->disk, lo->bytesize >> 9);
 		return 0;
 	case NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS:
 		lo->bytesize = ((u64) arg) * lo->blksize;
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_inode->i_size = lo->bytesize;
+		inode->i_bdev->bd_block_size = lo->blksize;
 		set_capacity(lo->disk, lo->bytesize >> 9);
 		return 0;
 	case NBD_DO_IT:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCHES 2.5.74-mm2] misc. nbd cleanups/fixes
  2003-07-06 20:11 [PATCHES 2.5.74-mm2] misc. nbd cleanups/fixes Paul Clements
@ 2003-07-06 20:33 ` Jeff Garzik
  2003-07-06 21:10   ` Paul Clements
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-07-06 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Clements; +Cc: akpm, linux-kernel

Paul Clements wrote:
> The two attached patches are:
> 
> 1) nbd-remove_open_release.diff - remove the unneeded nbd_open and
> nbd_release functions

Please remove the unneeded ->refcnt member as well.


> 2) nbd-block_layer_compat.diff - ensure that nbd and the block layer
> agree about device block sizes and total device sizes

Use set_blocksize, please.

Also, please split up your patches further.  The Linux (Linus?) standard 
is one patch per email...  Also, attachments are discouraged, though not 
a "no no" because of various broken corporate email systems...

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCHES 2.5.74-mm2] misc. nbd cleanups/fixes
  2003-07-06 20:33 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-07-06 21:10   ` Paul Clements
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Clements @ 2003-07-06 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Paul Clements, akpm, linux-kernel

On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Paul Clements wrote:
> > The two attached patches are:
> > 
> > 1) nbd-remove_open_release.diff - remove the unneeded nbd_open and
> > nbd_release functions
> 
> Please remove the unneeded ->refcnt member as well.

Yep, I forgot to do that...new patch on the way...

 
> > 2) nbd-block_layer_compat.diff - ensure that nbd and the block layer
> > agree about device block sizes and total device sizes
> 
> Use set_blocksize, please.

OK, I've done that in this next patch, also on the way...

 
> Also, please split up your patches further.  The Linux (Linus?) standard 
> is one patch per email...  Also, attachments are discouraged, though not 
> a "no no" because of various broken corporate email systems...

OK, thanks...

--
Paul


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-06 20:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-06 20:11 [PATCHES 2.5.74-mm2] misc. nbd cleanups/fixes Paul Clements
2003-07-06 20:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-06 21:10   ` Paul Clements

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox