From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new quota code
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F09FC12.4070609@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307072105.h67L50ir024592@hera.kernel.org>
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1059, 2003/07/07 17:01:15-03:00, hch@lst.de
>
> [PATCH] new quota code
>
> Okay, here's the quota patch. Basically all changes are from Jan Kara
> and I backport them from 2.5. The 32bit quota code has been shipped
> by the commercial vendors ever since they used Linux 2.4 and this
> particular codebase with backwards compatiblity support is around
> in the 2.5, the XFS tree, -ac and -aa for a long time. The only
> change over that version is that support for the old 16bit quota
> format and the old quotactl ABI is enabled unconditionally, i.e.
> there's no way to render your system unusable by wrong make config
> choices [1].
>
> [1] This also mean completely dropping support for the interim ABI
> used in the early 32bit quota patches as it's mutally incompatible
> to the old ABI. But we never ever shipped that in any mainline kernels
> so there's no problem.
"no problem" being defined here as "multiple vendors shipped it but I
don't care", right?
Why do we need a third (fourth?) 2.4 quota abi/api floating around?
Jeff
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-07 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200307072105.h67L50ir024592@hera.kernel.org>
2003-07-07 23:02 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-07-08 6:21 ` [PATCH] new quota code Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F09FC12.4070609@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox