From: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel 2.4.21
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:38:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F1957D3.1090308@unixtech.be> (raw)
Hi all,
I have a little question...
Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5
============================================
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
o ACPI apparently wasnt bios
o fix wrong date in microcode comment
o add another legitimate P4 type
o must disallow write combine on 450NX
o add framework for ndelay (nanoseconds)
o first block of parisc resend
o second block of parisc merge
o third block of parisc merge
o Ian Nelson moved
o update videobook docs to avoid check_region
o docs for IPMI
o remove dead init call
o add AMD hammer rng
o IPMI driver updates
o keyboard changes
o fix wrong test in raw driver
o fix paths for ide
o clarify hpt37x config
o fix more ide paths
o Paul's fix to do ide_cs handling in task context
o more ide paths
o fix use of check_region in umc driver
o more ide comment/doc info updates
o promise printk cleanups
o another wrong path
o IDE printk/cleanup bits
o fix padding on eepro driver
In this patch, is it possible that there is a problem in the fix of
eepro driver? Since I upgrade the kernel with 2.4.20-8 (kernel-source
tag in debian) which include this patch I have some problem with packets
which are sometimes truncated... (the server runs an ircd and the result
is a delink).
Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
OR
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
If I do a rollback, no more problems... I don't test yet a 2.4.21 kernel.
Hardware is a Dell PowerAppWeb 120A with one CPU P3 1 GHz / 256 Mo RAM /
Now Kernel is generated under debian with kernel-source-2.4.20-2 and gcc
version 2.95.4 20011002.
Any idea? (Thanks for your help)
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
reply other threads:[~2003-07-19 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F1957D3.1090308@unixtech.be \
--to=cedric.gavage@unixtech.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox