Re: Make menuconfig broken

bill davidsen
2003-07-23T22:46:32Z

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307222129070.17797-100000@phoenix.infradead.org>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> wrote:
|
| > Well there are 2 issues here:
| >
| > 1) How to handle "make oldconfig" on 2.4 config files. Which may not be
| > fixable in a manner that doesn't involve really ugly code.
| >
| > 2) That make menuconfig|xconfig on a clean 2.6 tree results in a kernel
| > that doesn't have console support. This will be something that will
| > come up over and over again in the future, and does not require ugly
| > hacks to fix.
|
| Instead of hacking up a oldconfig why not have the system detect old
| config files and refuse to build it and tell the user to start from
| scratch. I think this is acceptable.

I would say defconfig first, then menuconfig, but whatever. If you can't
do it right, don't do it at all. The problems introduced by almost-right
conversions are often harder to find than starting from default.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.