Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?

Andre Hedrick
2003-07-25T20:36:26Z

Where is the "deep" fork storaged, sounds interesting!
At lets it should buisness friendly.

-a

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote:
> > P.S. Offtopic. As I see it Linux & Linus have made the decision of
> > optimization. Linux after all is capitalismus creation: who has more
> > money do control everything. Server market has more money - they do more
> > work on kernel and they systems are not that far from developers'
> > workstations - so Linux gets more and more server/workstation oriented.
> > This will fit desktop market too - if your computer was made to run
> > WinXP AKA exp(bloat) - it will be capable to run any OS. Linus repeating
> > 'small is beatiful' sounds more and more like crude joke...
> > As for embedded market - it is already in deep fork and far far away
> > from vanilla kernels... Vanilla really not that relevant to real world...
>
> Vanilla will be what people put into it. And I have seen more messages from
> embedded people complaining, than actually doing and submitting patches for
> merging.
>
> So the embedded trees are a deep fork huh? Did you or anyone else do
> anything to merge during 2.5?!
>
> And now you see why there is a "deep" fork...
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>