From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272122AbTG2VBn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:01:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272128AbTG2VBm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:01:42 -0400 Received: from diomedes.noc.ntua.gr ([147.102.222.220]:93 "EHLO diomedes.noc.ntua.gr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272122AbTG2VBf (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3F26E221.6060306@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:07:45 +0300 From: Dimitris Apostolou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related) -- conclusion References: <3F26CAF2.8070009@gmx.net> <200307291958.h6TJw43o030219@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200307291958.h6TJw43o030219@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > So you want to use a number that controls the CPU scheduling to force the network > scheduling to go along? That's a bad idea waiting to happen. > Read my initial posting, what I propose is defining priorities for net and disk I/O independant to CPU priority