Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21

Martin Konold
2003-08-05T21:35:30Z

Am Dienstag, 5. August 2003 15:37 schrieb Rahul Karnik:

Hi,

> If disk is involved, your problem might simply be the incorrect
> readahead value. Try "hdparm -a 512".

This improved the situation noticeably while still beeing slower than 2.4.21.

I will test more recent kernels later tonight.

Regards,
-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: martin.konold@erfrakon.de