public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proper block queue reference counting
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:56:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F3268A7.6090901@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030807145027.GI2886@suse.de>

Jens Axboe wrote:
> blk_cleanup_queue() still does that, as does blk_put_queue() (same deal,
> each drop a reference, last reference frees the queue).
> 
> This first patch is just the frame work, the only thing that's
> referenced counted right now is that the returned object has one
> reference and when the driver cleans the queue it drops the reference
> causing it to be freed. Next step is making sure others that hold a
> reference to the queue also grab a reference to it, using
> blk_get_queue(). That's stuff like bdev_get_queue(), for instance.

Groovy, thanks for explaining.


>>2) the blk_init_queue really should change names, IMO.  The other 
>>subsystems in the kernel tend to use a "foo_alloc" or "alloc_foo" 
>>pattern when creating new objects.  blk_alloc_queue, or simply blk_alloc?
> 
> 
> blk_alloc_queue() would be fine. However, it's hard to screw the usage
> up since it returns a queue, so... And people with out-of-tree drivers
> that need to be converted need only look at the blk_init_queue()
> changes, easy to grep for.

OTOH, blk_init_queue is changing quite radically, and people converting 
drivers will have to change that area of code _anyway_, so why not 
change the name too?  :)  It might create more confusion than it solves, 
to have the same function radically changing its behavior.  So I 
respectfully disagree :)

(this is a minor point, anyway.  I'm happy about the patch as a whole)

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-07 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200308070909.h7799QHg022029@hera.kernel.org>
2003-08-07 14:36 ` [PATCH] Proper block queue reference counting Jeff Garzik
2003-08-07 14:50   ` Jens Axboe
2003-08-07 14:56     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-08-07 15:00       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F3268A7.6090901@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox