From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proper block queue reference counting
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:56:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F3268A7.6090901@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030807145027.GI2886@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> blk_cleanup_queue() still does that, as does blk_put_queue() (same deal,
> each drop a reference, last reference frees the queue).
>
> This first patch is just the frame work, the only thing that's
> referenced counted right now is that the returned object has one
> reference and when the driver cleans the queue it drops the reference
> causing it to be freed. Next step is making sure others that hold a
> reference to the queue also grab a reference to it, using
> blk_get_queue(). That's stuff like bdev_get_queue(), for instance.
Groovy, thanks for explaining.
>>2) the blk_init_queue really should change names, IMO. The other
>>subsystems in the kernel tend to use a "foo_alloc" or "alloc_foo"
>>pattern when creating new objects. blk_alloc_queue, or simply blk_alloc?
>
>
> blk_alloc_queue() would be fine. However, it's hard to screw the usage
> up since it returns a queue, so... And people with out-of-tree drivers
> that need to be converted need only look at the blk_init_queue()
> changes, easy to grep for.
OTOH, blk_init_queue is changing quite radically, and people converting
drivers will have to change that area of code _anyway_, so why not
change the name too? :) It might create more confusion than it solves,
to have the same function radically changing its behavior. So I
respectfully disagree :)
(this is a minor point, anyway. I'm happy about the patch as a whole)
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-07 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200308070909.h7799QHg022029@hera.kernel.org>
2003-08-07 14:36 ` [PATCH] Proper block queue reference counting Jeff Garzik
2003-08-07 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2003-08-07 14:56 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-08-07 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F3268A7.6090901@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox