From: kwijibo@zianet.com
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
richard.brunner@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Machine check expection panic
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:04:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F36B341.7@zianet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030810130752.GB586@wotan.suse.de>
Out of curiosity I decided to try this on some other Athlon
systems I have. I tried it on a dual Athlon MP 2400(2GHz)
system with a Tyan 2462 motherboard. Also I tried it on a
single Athlon XP 1800 with a Asus A7V motherboard. They
both booted fine with the 2.6.0-test2 kernel and the machine
exception code in it. So I am thinking either it is something
with the older CPU's or the CPU is actually borked. Like I said
though I have been using those 1.2GHz processors for a long time
with no problems.
Steve
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>The CPU's aren't overclocked and have worked fine for
>>me under much heavier loads than booting a kernel for
>>
>>
>
>It could be corrected ECC errors in the cache. If that
>happens I would consider it a hardware problem
>
>(now hidden with the disabled bank).
>
>
>
>>at least a year. Using the 2.4 kernel that is. Once
>>I remove the exception code from the kernel it boots
>>fine and runs fine under any load I put it under.
>>
>>
>
>I maintain that such a magic hack needs at least a big fat comment.
>
>I still find the change very suspicious, there isn't any errata that
>says that bank 0 is bad on Athlon.
>
>Also disabling a whole bank just for some buggy CPUs is quite a sledgehammer,
>it would be probably better to identify the bank 0 sub unit that causes it
>and only turn that off.
>
>-Andi
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-10 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3F3182B5.3040301@zianet.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030807002722.GA3579@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-08-07 1:00 ` Machine check expection panic Andi Kleen
2003-08-07 1:34 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-10 8:12 ` kwijibo
2003-08-10 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2003-08-10 21:04 ` kwijibo [this message]
2003-08-11 10:15 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-08-11 11:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-06 22:35 kwijibo
2003-08-06 23:05 ` Matt Mackall
2003-08-07 0:27 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F36B341.7@zianet.com \
--to=kwijibo@zianet.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.brunner@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox