From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre10 ACPI kennel oops
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:38:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F37D49B.6050409@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE009FC12@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
Brown, Len wrote:
>Was ACPI included in your 2.4.21 kernel? If no, then 2.4.22-pre10 may
>be the 1st time that Linux ACPI has examined the tables on this system.
>
>I'm not familiar with "woodruf" -- do it have a part number?
>First thing to do is to locate the latest BIOS for the board, and see if
>this is something that has already been fixed there.
>
>If the latest BIOS doesn't do it, then filing a bug under componenet
>ACPI will be the best way to get it fixed w/o having it fall through the
>
Still fails. A bug with quad, or the ACPI project?
>cracks.
>
>Thanks,
>-Len
>
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Samuel Flory [mailto:sflory@rackable.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:29 PM
>>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Subject: 2.4.22-pre10 ACPI kennel oops
>>
>>
>> I'm getting a kernel oops on the intel woodruf P4 motherboard under
>>2.4.22pre10. This config worked fine under 2.4.21. The output of
>>ksymoops is attached, and the raw oops is attached.
>>
>>ksymoops 2.4.4 on i686 2.4.20-8smp. Options used
>> -V (default)
>> -K (specified)
>> -L (specified)
>> -O (specified)
>> -m /boot/System.map-2.4.22-pre10 (specified)
>>
>>ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] polarity[0x0] trigger[0x0] lint[0x1])
>>ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] polarity[0x0] trigger[0x0] lint[0x1])
>>cpu: 0, clocks: 1328876, slice: 664438
>>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address f8803000
>>c022d588
>>*pde = 00000000
>>Oops: 0000
>>CPU: 0
>>EIP: 0010:[<c022d588>] Not tainted
>>Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
>>EFLAGS: 00010206
>>eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000001 edx: c1c13ec0
>>esi: f8802ffd edi: c1c13ee0 ebp: c1c13ec0 esp: c1c13e64
>>ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
>>Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c1c13000)
>>Stack: c1c13f1c c1c13f1c c1c13e84 c022d015 c1c13ec0 f8802fdd 00000024
>>f8802fdd
>> 00000008 c0492d37 c0492d24 00200000 c1c13eb0 c1c13ec0 c1c13f2c
>>c1c13eb0
>> c022c984 c1c13f1c c1c13ec0 00000008 c0492cab c0492ca2 c1c13f0c
>>54445353
>>Call Trace: [<c022d015>] [<c022c984>] [<c022cb68>] [<c022cd89>]
>>[<c022e124>]
>> [<c022e1fa>] [<c0105000>] [<c010508b>] [<c0105000>] [<c01075ae>]
>>[<c0105060>]
>>Code: f3 a5 e9 5c ff ff ff c1 e9 02 89 d7 f3 a5 a4 e9 4f ff ff ff
>>
>> >>EIP; c022d588 <__constant_memcpy+bd/f5> <=====
>>Trace; c022d015 <acpi_tb_get_table_header+11a/12d>
>>Trace; c022c984 <acpi_tb_get_primary_table+64/d2>
>>Trace; c022cb68 <acpi_tb_get_required_tables+45/2b4>
>>Trace; c022cd89 <acpi_tb_get_required_tables+266/2b4>
>>Trace; c022e124 <acpi_load_tables+34/188>
>>Trace; c022e1fa <acpi_load_tables+10a/188>
>>Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
>>Trace; c010508b <init+2b/190>
>>Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
>>Trace; c01075ae <arch_kernel_thread+2e/40>
>>Trace; c0105060 <init+0/190>
>>Code; c022d588 <__constant_memcpy+bd/f5>
>>00000000 <_EIP>:
>>Code; c022d588 <__constant_memcpy+bd/f5> <=====
>> 0: f3 a5 repz movsl
>>%ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi) <=====
>>Code; c022d58a <__constant_memcpy+bf/f5>
>> 2: e9 5c ff ff ff jmp ffffff63 <_EIP+0xffffff63>
>>Code; c022d58f <__constant_memcpy+c4/f5>
>> 7: c1 e9 02 shr $0x2,%ecx
>>Code; c022d592 <__constant_memcpy+c7/f5>
>> a: 89 d7 mov %edx,%edi
>>Code; c022d594 <__constant_memcpy+c9/f5>
>> c: f3 a5 repz movsl %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi)
>>Code; c022d596 <__constant_memcpy+cb/f5>
>> e: a4 movsb %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi)
>>Code; c022d597 <__constant_memcpy+cc/f5>
>> f: e9 4f ff ff ff jmp ffffff63 <_EIP+0xffffff63>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
>>(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
>>Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-11 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-07 3:06 2.4.22-pre10 ACPI kennel oops Brown, Len
2003-08-11 17:38 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-08-11 18:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-11 23:22 Brown, Len
2003-08-05 21:29 Samuel Flory
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F37D49B.6050409@rackable.com \
--to=sflory@rackable.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox