From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S273185AbTHKSCf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S273184AbTHKSCD (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:02:03 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:27073 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S273111AbTHKSBf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3F37D9F6.6050208@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:01:26 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: 4GB+DEBUG_PAGEALLOC oopses with 2.6.0-test3-mm1 References: <3F361F5E.10106@colorfullife.com> <3F37B4B7.9010108@colorfullife.com> <3F37BED1.405@colorfullife.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: >IMHO the mount-options API is quite unclean - since when do we guarantee >-EFAULT semantics? > > I don't know - I found copy_mount_options() with similar code in 1.0.9 :-( I agree that it's ugly as hell, but it's user space ABI. -- Manfred