Re: generic strncpy - off-by-one error

Timothy Miller
2003-08-15T17:37:20Z

Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:

> Timothy's 3.125003 6.128571 9.147905 33.325337

Which of mine did you test? The one with the single-byte fill, or the
one with the multiple fill loops that does words for the bulk of the fills?

With some minor tweaks to eliminate compiler stupidity which compares
against -1, that might win on the fill phase. No?