Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy

Nick Piggin
2003-08-22T13:11:36Z

Roger Luethi wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:53:01 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
>>I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to
>>remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if
>>anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some,
>>please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P
>>
>>
>
>I timed a pathological benchmark from hell I've been playing with lately.
>Three consecutive runs following a fresh boot. Time is in seconds:
>
>2.4.21 821 21 25
>2.6.0-test3-mm1 724 946 896
>2.6.0-test3-mm1-nick 905 987 997
>
>Runtime with ideal scheduling: < 2 seconds (we're thrashing).
>
>

Cool. Can you post the benchmark source please?