From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] renicing X
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:00:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4A3293.8070004@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
My scheduler patch really benefits a lot from renicing X. I
think its because it nices more nicely. Any reasons why this
might be a bad idea?
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-25 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 16:00 Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-08-25 17:12 ` [RFC] renicing X Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-08-25 17:37 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4A3293.8070004@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox