public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" <filia@softhome.net>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cache limit
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:08:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4BB043.6010805@softhome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oQh2.4bQ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>

Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote:
>>  If I have 1GB of memory and my applications for use only 16MB - it 
>>doesn't mean I want to fill 1GB-16MB with garbage like file my momy had 
>>viewed two weeks ago.
>>
>>  That's it: OS should scale for *application* *needs*.
>>
>>  Can you compare in your mind overhead of managing 1GB of cache with 
>>managing e.g. 16MB of cache?
>>
> 
> Ok, let's benchmark it.
> 
> Yes, I can see the logic in your argument, but at this point, numbers are
> needed to see if or how much of a win this might be.

   [ I beleive you can see those thread about O_STREAMING patch. 
Not-caching was giving 10%-15% peformance boost for gcc on kernel 
compiles. Isn't that overhead? ]

   I will try to produce some benchmarktings tomorrow with different 
'mem=%dMB'. I'm afraid to confirm that it will make difference.
   But in advance: mantainance of page tables for 1GB and for 128MB of 
RAM are going to make a difference.


       reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <oJ5P.699.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <oJ5P.699.23@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <oJ5P.699.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <oJ5P.699.27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <oJ5P.699.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <oQh2.4bQ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 19:08           ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau [this message]
2003-08-26 19:23             ` cache limit Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 10:21               ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-27 11:07                 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-27 16:03 Joseph Malicki
     [not found] <000801c36cb1$454d4950$1001a8c0@etofmv650>
2003-08-27 16:02 ` YoshiyaETO
     [not found] <n7lV.2HA.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <ofAJ.4dx.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <ogZM.5KJ.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <oyDw.5FP.33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 10:15       ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-26 17:46         ` Mike Fedyk
     [not found] <m6Bv.3ys.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <mLY8.dO.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-21  9:52   ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-25  7:17     ` Takao Indoh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-19  4:39 Anthony R.
2003-08-19  4:57 ` Nuno Silva
2003-08-19  5:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-08-19  6:20   ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19  9:05     ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19  9:16       ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19  9:28         ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19  9:43           ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 13:32     ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-19 20:56       ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 14:28   ` Anthony R.
2003-08-19 18:26     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19  5:42 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-21  0:49 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-21 23:47   ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-25  2:45     ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-25  4:11       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-25 22:58         ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-26  9:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27  9:36             ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27  9:45               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27 11:14                 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27 11:36                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 10:52                     ` Takao Indoh
2003-09-02 11:30                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 17:21                       ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 16:01                 ` Joseph Malicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F4BB043.6010805@softhome.net \
    --to=filia@softhome.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox