From: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
"Ramón Rey Vicente????" <retes_simbad@yahoo.es>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-2.4.22 released
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4C7E3D.3040403@basmevissen.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030825222215.GX7038@fs.tum.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Where's the problem with letting people switch from 2.4 to 2.6 and later
> from OSS to ALSA?
>
> Since OSS is still present in 2.6 I don't see any migration problems.
>
You can also reason the oter way around: Why not include ALSA in 2.4 and
let people phase out OSS already before 2.6? OSS can still be present in
2.4, so there are no migration problems in 2.6.
Bas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-27 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 11:48 linux-2.4.22 released Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-25 8:11 ` Enrico Demarin
2003-08-25 13:23 ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-25 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-08-25 13:35 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-08-25 21:13 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-25 22:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26 0:21 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-08-26 21:49 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-08-26 21:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26 22:29 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-08-27 2:15 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-08-27 5:21 ` Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
2003-08-27 1:20 ` Chuck Campbell
2003-08-27 1:48 ` David van Hoose
2003-08-27 1:55 ` David van Hoose
2003-08-27 3:28 ` Kurt Wall
2003-08-27 2:01 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-08-27 4:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-26 22:29 ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-27 9:47 ` Bas Mevissen [this message]
2003-08-26 13:55 ` Matthias Andree
2003-08-25 13:38 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-25 22:34 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-25 14:38 ` Yann Droneaud
2003-08-25 15:35 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-25 16:03 ` Luca Montecchiani
2003-08-25 19:18 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-25 20:00 ` Edesio Costa e Silva
2003-08-25 20:10 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-26 13:19 ` Rene Rebe
2003-08-26 15:00 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-27 3:47 ` CaT
2003-08-26 16:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-26 19:32 ` Greg KH
2003-08-26 1:52 ` cryptoapi doesn't build Tom Vier
2003-08-26 10:23 ` James Morris
2003-08-27 21:49 ` Tom Vier
2003-08-27 22:03 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-26 4:25 ` [PATCH-2.4] make log buffer length selectable Willy Tarreau
2003-08-27 20:09 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-27 20:48 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-25 16:25 linux-2.4.22 released Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-25 16:40 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-25 16:53 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-25 17:20 Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-27 21:45 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-08-26 22:25 John Bradford
2003-08-27 2:11 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-08-27 6:10 John Bradford
2003-08-28 2:31 ` bill davidsen
2003-08-27 11:10 Vid Strpic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4C7E3D.3040403@basmevissen.nl \
--to=ml@basmevissen.nl \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=retes_simbad@yahoo.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox