From: Valmar Joandi <valmar@linking.ee>
To: hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:53:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4DFB44.2080802@linking.ee> (raw)
Hi.
Has there been any changes recently? I search with google for that patch
but could'nt find anything, maybe I missed something?
And how about 2.6 kernel + 1210sa + sata seagate 120G?
-----------------------------FWD
MESSAGE--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G
From: Hugo Mills (hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:44:01 EST
* Next message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] Synaptics: support for
pass-through port (stick)"
* Previous message: Doug McNaught: "Re: question about linux tcp
request queue handling"
* In reply to: Elmer: "2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt ,
Seagate 120G"
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:42:32AM +0300, Elmer wrote:
> Tried them on every imaginable way:
>
> 1. 2.4.21 + my own siimage slight patch, 2.4.21 + simage from ac4,
> pure 2.4.21-ac4
> 2. apic, noapic, localapic
> 3. uni,smp motherboards, 4 of them
> 4. modules, compiled in,
> 5. all of options from cards bios
>
> /proc/interrupts reports 0 interrupts for ide2,3 , whatever I do.
>
> after bootup, after attacking ide-disk driver, there are lost interrupts.
> it recognises disk as correct type, but no communication except:
>
> 1. under XP it works (but there was no linux at that mb)
> 2. hdparm lets change few flags under linux, but no -X succeeds
> 3. after waiting for minute those timeouts and booting up, then
> /proc/ide/ide2/hde/* reports sensible correct information
>
> I have the card for few more days, anything to try ?
I've tried this card with all of the hdparm options that I could
think of. I got no success either. However, Andre Hedrick claims[1] to
have got the SiI3112 and 3114 working in his tree (a couple of weeks
ago). He's testing it[2] before release.
Hugo.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105622034606015&w=2
[2] I believe that one of the tests is whether he's got paid for the
work by the people who contracted him to do it, which is where I
suspect the real delay is.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- If it ain't broke, hit it again. ---
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-28 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-28 12:53 Valmar Joandi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-07 21:42 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G Elmer
2003-07-07 22:44 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4DFB44.2080802@linking.ee \
--to=valmar@linking.ee \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox