Re: We have ethtool_ops, any thoughts on miitool_ops?

[David T Hollis <dhollis@davehollis.com>]

David S. Miller wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:50:17 +0200
>Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 04:14, David T Hollis wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>If a driver is converted to use ethtool_ops, it does not seem to have 
>>>the ability to support mii-tool any longer.  RedHat uses mii-tool to 
>>>check for link before running dhclient so that you don't have to wait 
>>>forever for dhclient to timeout if the connection is down (laptops, 
>>>etc). 
>>>      
>>>
>>this is legacy; the road to the future for this is ethtool + the link
>>status change notification stuff 
>>    
>>
>
>Besides, the original claim is false.  You can still support all
>the other ioctls however you want, even the MII ones, after
>enabling ethtool_ops in a driver.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
>
Thanks for the pointer.  I didn't realize I could still have the old 
ioctl handler and just not worry about the ethool portion of it.