From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:47:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F5145BB.5080906@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062286661.31332.8.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2003-08-30 at 23:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>>> ifdef CONFIG_MPENTIUM4
>>>-CFLAGS += -march=i686
>>>+CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium4,-march=i686)
>>> endif
>>>
>>> ifdef CONFIG_MK6
>>
>>OK, I forgot what that does. Can you please explain in detail what
>>check_gcc does.
>
>
> Tries to use gcc with the options given and if not falls back to the
> second set suggested. So it'll try -march=pentium4 (new gcc) and
> fall back to -march=i686
Yep. I introduced check_gcc into 2.4 (backported from 2.5), in fact.
The above change does exactly what Alan describes, and is a patch I was
planning to submit myself :) I did not want to change compiler options
at the time when I submitted the check_gcc patch, but after many months
of manually patching to get the best compiler flags, it seems solid.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-31 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-30 15:48 Linux 2.4.23-pre2 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-30 16:22 ` Dave Bentham
2003-08-30 19:35 ` system_lists
2003-08-30 22:05 ` [PATCH] check_gcc for i386 J.A. Magallon
2003-08-30 22:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-30 23:20 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-31 2:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-30 23:31 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-30 23:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-31 0:47 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-08-31 0:59 ` Kurt Wall
2003-08-31 3:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-01 19:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-30 23:01 ` Andre Tomt
2003-08-30 23:11 ` Linux 2.4.23-pre2 - airo.c compile failure Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-09-03 15:56 ` [patch] fix airo.c compile failure with gcc 2.95 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-03 16:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-31 9:21 ` [PATCH] correct AT_PLATFORM for HT cpus J.A. Magallon
2003-09-02 15:18 ` [patch] 2.4.23-pre2: fix rocket.c compilation Adrian Bunk
2003-09-02 16:49 ` 2.4.23-pre2: 3c515.c doesn't compile non-modular Adrian Bunk
2003-09-02 17:47 ` [PATCH] " Jeff Garzik
2003-10-15 17:32 ` airo regression with Linux 2.4.23-pre2 Udo A. Steinberg
2003-10-15 19:47 ` Celso González
2003-10-15 21:27 ` Javier Achirica
2003-10-16 13:51 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2003-10-16 14:52 ` Marc Giger
2003-10-19 15:19 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-20 10:33 ` Javier Achirica
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F5145BB.5080906@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=marcelo@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox