public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:21:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com> (raw)

http://cs.nmu.edu/~benchmark/ has an interesting little graph
of LMBench results vs. Linux kernel version, all done with the
same compiler.

Has anyone seen a similar graph showing LMBench results vs. gcc version,
all done with the same Linux kernel?
And does everyone agree that's a meaningful way to compare the
performance of code generated by different compilers?

I happen to have a number of versions of gcc handy, and was
considering making such a graph, but was hoping somebody
else had already done it.

(There seems to be large variations in successive runs of LMBench
when I try it, so it may take me a bit of work to get repeatable
results.)

Thanks,
Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-31  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-31  7:21 Dan Kegel [this message]
2003-08-31 14:00 ` LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 14:28   ` Dan Kegel
     [not found]   ` <3F520773.1070907@kegel.com>
     [not found]     ` <20030831145956.GE23783@work.bitmover.com>
2003-08-31 22:53       ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-31 15:59   ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 16:18     ` Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 17:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-31 16:57 rwhron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com \
    --to=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox