From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262821AbTICGSI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 02:18:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263501AbTICGSI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 02:18:08 -0400 Received: from pimout6-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.78]:19080 "EHLO pimout6-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262821AbTICGSD (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 02:18:03 -0400 Message-ID: <3F5587A1.2020706@ameritech.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 01:18:09 -0500 From: watermodem Reply-To: aquamodem@ameritech.net Organization: not at all User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: re: 2.6.0-test 4 and USB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I forgot to note on the USB and CUPs problem that I see the USB tree under "/sys/bus/usb" where-as under /proc/bus/usb I see nothing. This may break a lot of existing code... Is is suppose to be this way?