From: Resident Boxholder <resid@boxho.com>
To: Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "bleating edge" What is the SiI 0680 chipset status?
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 22:19:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F56A147.1040009@boxho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062589779.19059.8.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
siimage.c is not broken, works, and may be perfect, since workarounds
point to ioapic
handling for which siimage.c is just downstream. ioapic code could be
fine, too, and
boards or chips responsible for ioapic problems, but ioapic is involved
when things
go wrong. Total ACPI lobotomy is unnecessary, acpi is valuable.
Alan Cox wrote:
>On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 17:55, Tomasz B±tor wrote:
>
>
>>I recently got MiNt PCI IDE ATA/133 RAID controller based on SiI 0680
>>chipset. I browsed through the archives and I know that the driver is
>>known to be broken and simply doesn't work.
>>
>>
>
>It just works. You do want 2.4.22 ideally, and you want 2.4.22-ac to use
>hotplug.
>
>Alan
>
SiI680 siig ata/133 card, siimage.c(and no separate cmd640 fix option)
kern 2.6.0-test4,
kernel APIC on but kernel IOAPIC off then hdparm -c1 -d1 -p9 -u0 -X70
the drives
on the sii680
cmos setup setting APIC off gets rtl8139c card to ping by letting linux
turn apic on
That's nforce2 mbo with rtl8139c on **card** and sii680 on card.
Then rtl8139a **onboard ** with all via chips in a Shuttle SK41G toaster
FX41 mbo had
the same no-ping problem fixed by using kernel 2.6.0-test2 or test4
instead of 2.4! That
defines 2.6 as "bleating edge" for sheeple--turning acpi off is more
drastic than necessary,
and the siimage.c driver is not "broken" or perhaps even involved with
the IOAPIC problem,
and using 2.6 can make something work where 2.4 doesn't.
I guess sii680 qualifies as bleatiing edge. I was close to going scsi-bear.
Actually I pulled the raid jumper off sii680 so sii680's two drives and
two more on
onboard amd74xx nforce2 are handled by linux software raid0, reiserfs.
-Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-04 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-02 16:55 What is the SiI 0680 chipset status? Tomasz B±tor
2003-09-03 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-04 1:42 ` Tomasz B±tor
2003-09-04 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-04 10:53 ` Tomasz B±tor
2003-09-04 2:19 ` Resident Boxholder [this message]
2003-09-03 12:42 ` Sebastian Piecha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F56A147.1040009@boxho.com \
--to=resid@boxho.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox