From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Use of AI for process scheduling
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:11:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F5DEDBD.5090808@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200309090119.h891JS307266@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com
Rick Lindsley wrote:
> Yeah, I didn't think his comment was very helpful since I thought it was
> clear that I was working on a draft of an IDEA.
>
> How complex is your thinking where *ideas* need drafts? :)
It wasn't so much complex as it was _vague_. :)
[snip]
> However, once we characterize "what we want" we might be able to
> communicate it (and code it) to the kernel. To that end, here's an
> update on scheduler statistics code. In testing, it's proved fairly
> non-intrusive and may provide some answers to "what we want". If it
> doesn't, it's fairly extensible if done carefully.
>
> http://eaglet.rain.com/rick/linux/schedstat/
>
> This patch (against 2.6.0-test4 or 2.6.0-test5) collects data about
> scheduler decisions, which may allow us, with 20/20 hindsight, to
> determine which specific decisions we don't like and perhaps how to
> modify them.
Now, THIS is the kind of thing I wanted to see! Very cool. My thought
then is that it might be helpful to have some tools to help analyze this
raw data. I'm sure you thought of that already. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-09 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-08 19:28 Use of AI for process scheduling Timothy Miller
2003-09-08 21:55 ` Jeff Sipek
2003-09-08 22:56 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-08 22:28 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-09-08 23:01 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-08 23:57 ` David Lang
2003-09-09 0:34 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-09 1:40 ` Robin Rosenberg
2003-09-09 1:57 ` Robin Rosenberg
2003-09-09 15:16 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-09 15:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2003-09-08 22:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-08 23:06 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-08 23:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-09 0:22 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-09 1:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-09 15:08 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-09 17:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-09 0:06 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-09 1:19 ` Rick Lindsley
2003-09-09 15:11 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-09 19:05 John Yau
2003-09-08 18:57 Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F5DEDBD.5090808@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox