From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262621AbTI2VEh (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:04:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262465AbTI2VEh (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:04:37 -0400 Received: from uni06mr.unity.ncsu.edu ([152.1.1.169]:23685 "EHLO uni06mr.unity.ncsu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262621AbTI2VEg (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:04:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3F788DE4.8030505@unity.ncsu.edu> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:54:12 -0400 From: Yifan Zhu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: TIMER_BH in 2.4 kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm looking at the 2.4 kernel. My understanding of the code is that the TIMER_BH handler is executed when the hardware timer interrupt returns ( after do_IRQ(), but before returning to the interrupted task ). Is that right? Thanks for clarification! Yifan