public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -mregparm=3 (was  Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:28:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F793EB8.7010605@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200309291954.h8TJsm6p002210@turing-police.cc.vt.edu

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> Quite correct - even after recompiling the sourced portions of the NVidia
> driver, it dies a horrid death on 'insmod' when the closed-source portion
> passes a parameter on the stack and the open side expects the value in a
> register, and follows the register value to a quick death....
> 
Nvidia can fix this easily. Either by having several versions of
their closed-source thing, or by having a open "interface" that
uses nvidia's calling convention for talking to their proprietary
binary code, and whatever the kernel uses for talking to the kernel.
That's the price of binary modules -
One extra level of indirection, or a bunch of different modules.
Of course there are plenty of other cards without
such problems.

Helge Hafting


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-30  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-28 16:29 [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:30   ` Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 18:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 18:44       ` Brian Gerst
2003-09-28 19:04   ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-09-29 18:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 19:23       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-29 19:54       ` -mregparm=3 (was " Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30  8:28         ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2003-09-30 15:29           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-29 20:20     ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 20:26       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:36         ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:40           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 21:43             ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-09-29 21:48           ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-09-30  0:24           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-30  4:49           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30  4:55             ` Robert Love
2003-09-30 14:37               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-30 15:48                 ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F793EB8.7010605@aitel.hist.no \
    --to=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox