* compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32
@ 2003-10-04 15:06 Christian Kujau
2003-10-04 17:39 ` Matthias Urlichs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2003-10-04 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
hi,
upon compiling kernel 2.6.0-test6 on my PowerPC 604r machine (PReP),
i got the following error:
evil@sheep:/usr/src/linux-2.6$ make bzImage modules
make[1]: `arch/ppc/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S
AS .tmp_kallsyms1.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux2
KSYM .tmp_kallsyms2.S
AS .tmp_kallsyms2.o
LD vmlinux
AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section
attributes for .relocate_code
arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
make: *** [zImage] Error 2
evil@sheep:/usr/src/linux-2.6$ cp .config ~/
(the compile-process was about to finish last time, then i got this very
same error, but could not save it. now calling "make bzImage" has a very
less to re-compile, hence the few messages. oh, yes: i *do* have write
permission to [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] )
i tried with:
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.6 20030820 Debian GNU/Linux
GNU Make 3.80
distribution is Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
my config is on:
http://www.nerdbynature.de/bits/ppc/.config
i can compile 2.4 kernels very well with the same utils.
Thank you,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #442:
Trojan horse ran out of hay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32
2003-10-04 15:06 compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32 Christian Kujau
@ 2003-10-04 17:39 ` Matthias Urlichs
2003-10-05 19:32 ` Christian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Urlichs @ 2003-10-04 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi, Christian Kujau wrote:
> upon compiling kernel 2.6.0-test6 on my PowerPC 604r machine (PReP),
> i got the following error:
>
That's a regression in binutils. Debian/unstable fixed it in version
2.14.90.0.6-3.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
...a noble practice which does honor to women.
-- Sheik Gad Al Haq Ali Gad Al Haq, explaining
clitorectomy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32
2003-10-04 17:39 ` Matthias Urlichs
@ 2003-10-05 19:32 ` Christian
2003-10-07 14:04 ` Matthias Urlichs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian @ 2003-10-05 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Christian Kujau wrote:
>
>
>>upon compiling kernel 2.6.0-test6 on my PowerPC 604r machine (PReP),
>>i got the following error:
>>
>
> That's a regression in binutils. Debian/unstable fixed it in version
> 2.14.90.0.6-3.
indeed! i just have to update *even more* often :-)
hm, the term "regression" is only known to me from mathematics, but i
don't know how this could be related to compiling issues....
Thank you, 2.6.0-test6 is compiling now.
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #88:
Boss' kid fucked up the machine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32
2003-10-05 19:32 ` Christian
@ 2003-10-07 14:04 ` Matthias Urlichs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Urlichs @ 2003-10-07 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi, Christian wrote:
>> That's a regression in binutils. Debian/unstable fixed it in version
>> 2.14.90.0.6-3.
>
> indeed! i just have to update *even more* often :-)
>
Or less often. :-/
> hm, the term "regression" is only known to me from mathematics, but i
> don't know how this could be related to compiling issues....
It's a fairly standard term. Basically, it means that some feature
(interpreted broadly, e.g. "compiles this piece of code correctly")
worked in version X but fails to do so due to a bug (as opposed to a
feature change or removal) in version Y, where Y>X. Most often, the first
step of fixing the problem is increasing X or decreasing Y successively so
that X==Y-1.
> Thank you, 2.6.0-test6 is compiling now.
You're welcome.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Virtue is its own punishment.
-- Denniston
Righteous people terrify me ... virtue is its own punishment.
-- Aneurin Bevan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-07 14:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-04 15:06 compile error with 2.6.0-test6 on ppc32 Christian Kujau
2003-10-04 17:39 ` Matthias Urlichs
2003-10-05 19:32 ` Christian
2003-10-07 14:04 ` Matthias Urlichs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox