From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264046AbTJFSA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:00:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264045AbTJFSA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:00:59 -0400 Received: from wsip-68-14-236-254.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.14.236.254]:27624 "EHLO office.lsg.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264044AbTJFSAy (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:00:54 -0400 Message-ID: <3F81ADC8.3090403@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:00:40 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" Organization: Back to Basics Network Management User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Christian Borntraeger , Al Viro , Patrick Mochel , LKML , Dipankar Sarma Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Backing Store for sysfs References: <20031006174128.GA4460@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20031006174128.GA4460@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > > That's good. But what happens after you run a find over the sysfs tree? > Which is essencially what udev will be doing :) > This sounds like an opportunity to improve the udev<->sysfs interaction. Does the hotplug event not give udev enough information to avoid this "find" search?