From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262465AbTJIUar (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:30:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262490AbTJIUar (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:30:47 -0400 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166]:3754 "EHLO natsmtp01.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262465AbTJIUap (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:30:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3F85C549.9050207@softhome.net> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 22:30:01 +0200 From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" Organization: Home Sweet Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030927 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maciej Zenczykowski CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: CPU Usage for particular User Login References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Maciej Zenczykowski wrote: >>You can also run a lot of top programs, each for one user (type 'u' >>while in top). >> >>Regards, >>Nuno Silva > > > nb. is their a way to get fair 'equal time / proc percentage per user' > queueing of the CPU(s). > > i.e. not limiting the number of processes/user but limiting the total CPU > 'power' in use by a given user, something like the CBQ network > schedulers... perhaps with some classes (like root) more priveledged > etc... or is this something for 2.7? > Cannot be sure - but try to google in direction of "vserver linux". Digging into the lkml archives on vserver can give you some pointers. At least some posters were hinting that vserver has capability to limit CPU usage of given task. -- Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken. -- "... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?" -- Al Viro @ LKML