From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262736AbTJJI5d (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:57:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262746AbTJJI5c (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:57:32 -0400 Received: from madness.at ([213.153.61.104]:47877 "EHLO cronos.madness.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262736AbTJJI5b (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:57:31 -0400 Message-ID: <3F86746C.6040704@madness.at> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:57:16 +0200 From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030930 Debian/1.4-5 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz CC: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Serverworks CSB5 IDE-DMA Problem (2.4 and 2.6) References: <200310092313.05371.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <3F85D17D.2090006@madness.at> <200310092329.00445.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <200310092329.00445.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > 2.4.18, 2.4.19 w/o APIC and ACPI ok 2.4.18 (dmesg at http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/dmesg2418.txt) seems to work better(although not as fast as I would like to have it) but I suspect that: ide1: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not functional. ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not functional. is quite interesting - if these UDMA-modes do not work reliable - why do they get enabled with later kernels(not that I would have a problem with getting UDMA > 2 working *g*) ? Stefan