From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262015AbTJNGa6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:30:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262074AbTJNGa6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:30:58 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:15846 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262015AbTJNGa5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:30:57 -0400 Message-ID: <3F8B9820.6010208@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:30:56 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: jw@pegasys.ws, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, nikita@namesys.com Subject: Re: ReiserFS patch for updating ctimes of renamed files References: <20031012071447.GJ8724@pegasys.ws> <3F8A3CE0.4060705@namesys.com> <20031013032431.1ed40c25.akpm@osdl.org> <3F8B93F7.2020805@namesys.com> <20031013232527.3cf5701f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031013232527.3cf5701f.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: >Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>do you think schultz's arguments about why it is wrong are correct? >>They seem well thought out to me. >> >> > >Well given that you've renamed the file, you do want the backup program to >pick up the "new" file. But it'd be a pretty lame backup program which was >fooled by a missing ctime update. > >Yes, John has a point but we're not going to go and change all the other >filesystems (are we?). > > > > > why not? It is correct therefor.... -- Hans