From: Wes Janzen <superchkn@sbcglobal.net>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
Cc: Norman Diamond <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>,
John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:05:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8BA037.9000705@sbcglobal.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031014064925.GA12342@bitwizard.nl>
Rogier Wolff wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 07:24:00PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote:
>
>
>>John Bradford replied to me:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>How can I tell Linux to read every sector in the partition? Oh, I might
>>>>know this one,
>>>> dd if=/dev/hda8 of=/dev/null
>>>>I want to make sure that the drive is now using a non-defective
>>>>replacement sector.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>A read won't necessarily do that. You might have to write to a
>>>defective sector to force re-allocation.
>>>
>>>
>>I agree, we are not sure if a read will do that. That is the reason why two
>>of my preceding questions were:
>>
>>
>
>I've seen a disk (which now failed and will be replaced 3 hours from now)
>remap defective sectors without reporting any errors to the OS.
>The SMART "remapped sector count" just went up, but no errors in the
>logs. So apparently, the disk noticed something and remapped teh sector
>without anybody noticing.
>
>
Can't you pretty much get the drive to check itself using smartctl, such
as running:
smartctl -o on -s on -S on /dev/hde &> /dev/null
in an init script? Also, I think if you just happen to write to a bad
sector the drive will remap it without a warning (unless it doesn't have
any remapping sectors left), but if you read from it then to get the
drive to "notice" it, you have to write back to that sector. Or run the
drive test which should find it and correct it.
>
>
>> How can I find out which file contains the bad sector? I would like to
>> try to recreate the file from a source of good data.
>>
>>
>
>Try:
> tar cf - / | dd of=/dev/null
>
>(note some people will try to abbreviate that to
> tar cf /dev/null /
>but that won't work: Tar will recognise that it's writing to /dev/null
>and skip reading the files! That's a bug in tar in my book. )
>
>
>
>> How can I tell Linux to mark the sector as bad, knowing the LBA sector
>> number?
>>
>>
>
>man tune2fs .
>
>You have to do the math on the LBA sector numbers (subtract the
>partition start, divide by two).
>
>Also, you can use the "badblocks" program.
>
>
I think he's using reiserfs on the partition, which ASFAIK doesn't
support marking bad sectors without some work. I tend to agree with
namesys when they suggest just getting a new drive if it has used up all
of its extra sectors. In my experience (admittedly limited), any drive
which runs out of extra sectors starts to go bad in a hurry.
-Wes-
> Roger.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-14 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-13 9:31 Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them? Norman Diamond
[not found] ` <200310131014.h9DAEwY3000241@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
2003-10-13 10:24 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 10:33 ` John Bradford
2003-10-13 11:30 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 11:58 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-10-15 10:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 12:02 ` John Bradford
2003-10-15 10:23 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-15 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-14 6:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-13 14:24 ` Chuck Campbell
2003-10-13 14:54 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-10-13 16:29 ` Roger Larsson
2003-10-14 6:49 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 7:05 ` Wes Janzen [this message]
2003-10-14 7:21 ` John Bradford
2003-10-14 7:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 8:11 ` John Bradford
2003-10-14 8:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 9:46 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 9:57 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 10:10 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 10:31 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 10:19 ` John Bradford
[not found] ` <200310140800.h9E80BT9000815@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20031014081110.GA14418@bitwizard.nl>
2003-10-14 8:55 ` Wes Janzen
2003-10-14 10:05 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 7:24 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 9:04 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-15 10:23 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-15 10:39 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 9:40 ` Blockbusting news, this is important (Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?) Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 9:48 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 11:11 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 11:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 11:51 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 12:53 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 13:03 ` Russell King
2003-10-17 13:26 ` John Bradford
2003-10-19 7:50 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-17 13:04 ` Russell King
2003-10-17 14:09 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 9:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-17 10:15 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 10:24 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-17 10:49 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 11:09 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-17 11:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-17 19:35 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 23:28 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-18 7:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-18 8:30 ` John Bradford
2003-10-21 20:26 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-18 8:27 ` John Bradford
2003-10-18 12:02 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-18 16:26 ` Nuno Silva
2003-10-18 20:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
[not found] ` <m37k33igui.fsf@defiant. <m3u166vjn0.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl>
2003-10-21 20:39 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-17 10:37 ` ATA Defect management John Bradford
2003-10-21 20:44 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-17 12:08 ` Blockbusting news, this is important (Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?) Justin Cormack
2003-10-21 20:12 ` bill davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-12 8:25 Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them? Norman Diamond
2003-10-11 9:00 Norman Diamond
2003-10-11 9:39 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F8BA037.9000705@sbcglobal.net \
--to=superchkn@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).