From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262801AbTJPKkL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:40:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262802AbTJPKkL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:40:11 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:8322 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262801AbTJPKkI (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:40:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3F8E757A.5010008@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 06:39:54 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Blueman CC: Antonio Vargas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] [2.4.21] 8139too 'too much work at interrupt'... References: <20031015172030.GA20098@wind.cocodriloo.com> <17122.1066291319@www7.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <17122.1066291319@www7.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Blueman wrote: > I have seen problems like this when a bad driver was spending loads of time > in it's SA_INTERRUPT (ie meant to be 'fast') IRQ handler ...this buffered up > *lots * of packets to be handled, and caused this message. > > Perhaps we should profile? There is no need to profile, I described the problem precisely. Jeff