From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263588AbTJQSv5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:51:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263591AbTJQSv4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:51:56 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:38016 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263588AbTJQSvz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:51:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3F903A49.4090007@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:51:53 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikita Danilov CC: Reiserfs mail-list , Reiserfs developers mail-list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: new reiser4 snapshot References: <16272.3551.934067.370680@laputa.namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <16272.3551.934067.370680@laputa.namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This snapshot fixes two fatal bugs, and improves performance. Nikita can still make it crash, sigh, and we have discovered some unnecessary seeks when replicating Mike Benoit's settings for bonnie++ that are due to block allocation bugs. Sigh. We are probably still at least 2 weeks away from code that we can seriously ask people to use. The performance is good enough to be well worth using despite the allocation bugs, but we don't like to ask people to use code we know how to crash. -- Hans