From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261176AbTJQWJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:09:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261188AbTJQWJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:09:17 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:47818 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261176AbTJQWJQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:09:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3F90687E.8030601@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:09:02 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Wong CC: Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > From: John Wong > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > status=0x00001000. > > The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > enabled. > > I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. Jeff