* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171852330.12627-100000@logos.cnet> @ 2003-10-17 22:09 ` Jeff Garzik 2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong 2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-10-17 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Wong; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Linux Kernel > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > status=0x00001000. > > The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > enabled. > > I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) 2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik @ 2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong [not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net> 2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: John Wong @ 2003-10-19 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Linux Kernel Hi, I took a slightly different route, and updated the kernel to 2.4.23-pre7 and disabled ACPI. The problem did reoccur, so this would rule out ACPI. I will downgrade the kernel to pre2 now. Oct 18 21:46:58 cyclops kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. John On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net> > >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > > status=0x00001000. > > > >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > >enabled. > > > >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 > > > This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do > would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. > > Jeff > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net>]
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) [not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net> @ 2003-10-19 7:22 ` John Wong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: John Wong @ 2003-10-19 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Reposting to the LKML as my previous post had a technical difficulty. John On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:10:12AM -0700, John Wong wrote: > I received the same problem with 2.4.23-pre2. Just to amuse myself, I > booted up 2.4.22 and the problem of Too much work still occurs. > > John > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:09:53PM -0700, John Wong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I took a slightly different route, and updated the kernel to 2.4.23-pre7 > > and disabled ACPI. The problem did reoccur, so this would rule out > > ACPI. I will downgrade the kernel to pre2 now. > > > > Oct 18 21:46:58 cyclops kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, > > status=0x00001000. > > > > John > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > > > >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net> > > > >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > > > > status=0x00001000. > > > > > > > >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > > > >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > > > >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > > > >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > > > >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > > > >enabled. > > > > > > > >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > > > > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 > > > > > > > > > This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do > > > would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) 2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik 2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong @ 2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong 2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: John Wong @ 2003-10-23 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel Could the problem detailed in the thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2 with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver? John On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net> > >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > > status=0x00001000. > > > >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > >enabled. > > > >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 > > > This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do > would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. > > Jeff > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) 2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong @ 2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti 2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2003-10-24 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Wong; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Wong wrote: > Could the problem detailed in the thread: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2 > > with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver? No this is a different bug. In previous message you said 2.4.22 also was spitting "too much work at interrupt". Correct? Which kernel works on this box? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) 2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti @ 2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: John Wong @ 2003-10-24 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:02:30AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Wong wrote: > > > Could the problem detailed in the thread: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2 > > > > with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver? > > No this is a different bug. > > In previous message you said 2.4.22 also was spitting "too much work at > interrupt". Correct? Correct. 2.4.22 had this same problem. > Which kernel works on this box? I have never had a kernel that has worked with this box as is. The 2.4.22 kernel worked fine on the system before I replaced the motherboard/CPU/RAM. 2.4.22 was compiled with Pentium optimizations for a Pentium 100 on a 430FX chipset. 2.4.23-pre6 (now pre7) is compiled with K6 optimizations for a K6 2 500 on a MVP3 chipset. ACPI was initially enabled on the 23-preX kernels, but disabled when Jeff suggested it might have been the problem. Both systems used the same OS/harddrive/NICs. John ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-24 22:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171852330.12627-100000@logos.cnet>
2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong
[not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net>
2003-10-19 7:22 ` John Wong
2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).