From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262748AbTJTTlg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:41:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262747AbTJTTlg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:41:36 -0400 Received: from ip5.searssiding.com ([216.54.166.5]:41177 "EHLO texas.encore.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262748AbTJTTlf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:41:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3F943A6D.5863749A@compro.net> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:41:33 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.20-ert i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: preempt patches and such for amd64? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Are the preempt, low latency, and cpu affinity patches applicable to the amd-64 platform running in native 64 bit mode? I would also like to know the same about the O(1) scheduler patches. If not, will/does the 2.6 kernel implement these for amd-64? Thank you Mark