From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261895AbTJ2FDJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:03:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261903AbTJ2FDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:03:08 -0500 Received: from mail-08.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.40]:41438 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261895AbTJ2FDG (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:03:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3F9F4841.2040904@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:55:29 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox Subject: Re: SiS ISA bridge IRQ routing on 2.6 ... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Davide Libenzi wrote: >Linus, I saw that Marcelo merged Alan bits to fix the IRQ routing with the >newest SiS ISA bridges. To make it really short the ISA bridge inside the >SiS 85C503/5513 issue IRQ routing requests on 0x60, 0x61, 0x62 and 0x63 >for the USB hosts and the current code does not handle them correctly. >2.6-test9 does not have those bits and the USB subsystem won't work w/out >that. Did Alan ever posted the patch for 2.6? If yes, did you simply miss >it or you have a particular reason to not merge it? >I really would like to remove the SiS IRQ patch from my to-apply-2.6 >folder :) > > Alan thought I should put SiS IRQ routing on the must-fix list. Doesn't mean it has to go in before 2.6.0, but if its common hardware and its in 2.4 without problems its probably a good idea.