From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262181AbTJ3F23 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:28:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262186AbTJ3F23 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:28:29 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:60848 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262181AbTJ3F22 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:28:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3FA0A16D.6080607@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:28:13 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trelane@digitasaru.net CC: Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right References: <20031030013418.GD3094@digitasaru.net> <20031030031631.GB15309@digitasaru.net> In-Reply-To: <20031030031631.GB15309@digitasaru.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joseph Pingenot wrote: >>>From Bernd Eckenfels on Thursday, 30 October, 2003: > >>In article <20031030013418.GD3094@digitasaru.net> you wrote: >> >>>I don't see any reason why we *shouldn't* look at the problem and try to >>> do it. What reasons do you see for not persuing the problem to its >>> inevitible implementation? >> >>Just do it. :) >>Greetings >>Bernd > > > Hee hee. The Other Shoe Drops. This ought to be written down as > Some-and-Such's Law: All Open Source Debates Will Continue Until Someone > Tells Someone Else to Shut Up and Code It. ;) What, it's not yet time to invoke Godwin's Law? ;) Jeff