Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right

David S. Miller
2003-10-31T21:08:46Z

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:47:26 +0300
Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:

> If you say that names resolve to single objects and never should
> resolve to sets of objects, we disagree.

While I have no personal opinion either way on the utility of such an
idea, I do think that if we ever do support a "one to many" mapping of
names to inodes we should make you do the security audit of a full
Linux system in the presence of this feature, deal? :-)