From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Debian Kernels was: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431"
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:54:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA77756.8020606@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104210310.GA1068@matchmail.com>
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Just because Debian is
>
>completely OSS and maintained mostly by unpaid volunteers, that shouldn't keep
>them from having a seperate tree like everyone else.
>
>
Yes it should. They have less fiscal motivation to horde software than
other distros, and a distro having it's own tree is a mild version of
software hording in which you don't do anything legally to stop others
from copying your code but you don't do the work necessary for them to
share in it either.
--
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 15:49 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" lkml-031028
2003-10-28 18:36 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-28 20:27 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-10-28 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-28 22:15 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-29 6:56 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-29 17:44 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-29 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-29 21:49 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-10-29 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-30 6:22 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-30 6:51 ` lkml-031028
2003-11-02 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-02 9:18 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-11-02 9:27 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 9:40 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-02 9:54 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 11:54 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-02 21:09 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-03 10:20 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-04 8:10 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-04 21:03 ` Debian Kernels was: " Mike Fedyk
2003-11-04 9:54 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2003-11-04 23:49 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-05 0:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-16 13:05 ` Pavel Machek
2003-11-16 3:55 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-16 14:15 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 17:05 ` Pavel Machek
2003-11-16 17:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-16 17:40 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 18:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-16 22:54 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 17:30 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-02 11:50 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-02 20:33 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA77756.8020606@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox