From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EFAULT reading /dev/mem... - broken x86info
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:59:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FAFDFFF.70100@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031110180551.GA20168@vana.vc.cvut.cz>
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:17:37PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
>
>>DEBUG_PAGEALLOC unmaps pages on kmem_cache_free and __free_pages(). The
>>pages are mapped again during get_free_pages and kmem_cache_alloc.
>>
>>0x86000 looks like a normal page - what guarantees that it's not used by
>>the kernel?
>>
>>
>
>With DEBUG_PAGEALLOC there is no problem with page if it is USED by the kernel.
>Problem is if page is NOT USED - in this case kernel does not have it in its
>mapping, and bad thing happen.
>
>
If the page is used by AGP, then it won't have a mapping either.
>x86info (and other simillar tools for dumping different BIOS structures) just
>scans physical memory for some well known signatures - hoping that kernel did
>not smash these structures.
>
>
Scanning physical memory is very dangerous: it's undefined what happens
if a page is mapped multiple times with different cache settings. Athlon
cpus prefetch whatever they see, and they speculatively set the dirty
bit in cachelines for WB cacheable pages.
>Up to now it was possible to read whole physical memory from userspace - some
>pages by reading /dev/mem, some pages by mmaping /dev/mem. Now it is not possible
>anymore - which I think is bad, as /dev/mem has semantic of it.
>
I think /dev/mem should lie and return 0x00 for pages that are not in
the linear mapping.
Or /dev/mem users should expect random holes.
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-10 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-08 16:27 EFAULT reading /dev/mem... - broken x86info Petr Vandrovec
2003-11-10 13:55 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-10 16:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-11-10 16:50 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-10 16:56 ` Dave Jones
2003-11-10 17:17 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-10 18:05 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-11-10 18:59 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2003-11-10 19:36 ` Mika Penttilä
2003-11-10 19:47 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-10 20:24 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FAFDFFF.70100@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox